|
Metric No |
Sub-Metric No |
Chapter |
Download Additional Document |
Data Template |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership |
|
|
|
6.1.1 |
|
The institutional governance and leadership are in accordance with the vision and mission of the Institution and it is visible in various institutional practices such as NEP implementation, sustained institutional growth, decentralization, participation in the institutional governance and in their short term and long term Institutional Perspective Plan |
|
|
|
6.1.2 |
|
The institution practices decentralization and participative management |
||
|
6.1.3 |
|
The governance of the institution is reflective of an effective leadership in tune with the vision and mission of the institution |
||
|
6.1.4 |
|
Percentage of teaching and non-teaching staff participating in Faculty development Programmes (FDP), Management Development Programmes (MDPs) professional development /administrative training programs during the last five years |
Copy of the certificates of the program attended by teachers |
|
|
|
6.1.4.2 |
Copy of the certificates of the program attended by teachers. |
Copy of the certificates of the program attended by teachers |
|
|
|
|
6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment |
|
|
|
6.2.1 |
|
The institutional perspective plan is effectively deployed and functioning of the institutional bodies is effective and efficient as visible from policies, administrative setup, appointment, service rules, and procedures, etc |
||
|
6.2.2 |
|
Organizational structure of the institution including governing body, administrative setup, and functions of various bodies, service rules, procedures, recruitment, promotional policies as well as grievance redressal mechanism |
|
|
|
6.2.3 |
|
Implementation of e-governance in areas of operation |
|
|
|
6.2.4 |
|
Effectiveness of various bodies/cells/committees is evident through minutes of meetings and implementation of their resolutions |
|
|
|
|
|
6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies |
|
|
|
6.3.1 |
|
The institution has performance appraisal system, effective welfare measures for teaching and non-teaching staff |
||
|
6.3.2 |
|
Average percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies during the last five years |
|
|
|
|
6.3.2.1 |
Number of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies year wise during the last five years |
||
|
6.3.3 |
|
Percentage of teaching and non-teaching staff participating in Faculty development Programmes (FDP), Management Development Programmes (MDPs) professional development/administrative training programs during the last five years |
|
|
|
|
6.3.3.1 |
Total number of professional development /administrative training Programmes organized by the institution for teaching and non teaching staff year wise during the last five years |
||
|
6.3.4 |
|
Average percentage of teachers attending professional development Programmes viz., Orientation Programme, Refresher Course, Short Term Course, Faculty Development Programmes during the last five years |
|
|
|
|
6.3.4.1 |
Total number of teachers attending professional development Programmes viz., Orientation Programme, Refresher Course, Short Term Course, Faculty Development Programmes year wise during the last five years |
||
|
6.3.5 |
|
Institution has Performance Appraisal System for teaching and nonteaching staff |
|
|
|
|
|
6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization |
|
|
|
6.4.1 |
|
Institution has strategies for mobilization and optimal utilization of resources and funds from various sources (government/nongovernment organizations) and it conducts financial audits regularly (internal and external) |
|
|
|
6.4.2 |
|
Funds / Grants received from non-government bodies, individuals, philanthropers during the last five years (not covered in Criterion III) (INR in Crores) |
|
|
|
|
6.4.2.1 |
Total Grants received from non-government bodies, individuals, Philanthropers year wise during the last five years (INR in crores) |
||
|
6.4.3 |
|
Institutional strategies for mobilisation of funds and the optimal utilisation of resources |
||
|
|
|
6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System |
|
|
|
6.5.1 |
|
Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes |
||
|
6.5.2 |
|
Quality assurance initiatives of the institution include |
||
|
6.5.3 |
|
The institution reviews its teaching learning process, structures & methodologies of operations and learning outcomes at periodic intervals through IQAC set up as per norms |
||
|
6.5.4 |
|
Average number of quality initiatives by IQAC for promoting quality culture per year |
|
|
|
|
6.5.4.1 |
Number of quality initiatives by IQAC for promoting quality year wise for the last five years |
||
|
6.5.5 |
|
Incremental improvements made for the preceding five years (in caseof first cycle) Post accreditation quality initiatives(second and subsequent cycles) |
|
|
|
6.5.6 |
6.5.6.1 |
Collaborative quality initiatives |